" "

An assistant football manager wins over £300,000 after ‘leaving the pitch’

17 Jan 2017
by Sharma Solicitors

Leeds United 0 Nigel Gibbs 1

Football club owners cannot treat managers badly even if they don’t respect their competence.

Leeds United discovered this after their assistant manager, Nigel Gibbs, won a constructive dismissal case brought to a High Court.

Gibbs had a fixed-term contract with the club in 2013 when the manager, Brian Mc Dermott, was hired. But he decided to stay on when new owners paid Mr. McDermott to leave.

Problems began when the new owners did not put Gibbs in charge of the first team. Instead, they offered him the under-18 team.

Gibbs felt he should be treated in terms of his new status and refused. Things got worse when the owner then said he should clean the grounds. He resigned and went to court to force them to pay off his contract.

Judges agreed with him and awarded him damages of £331,426.

What is constructive dismissal?

An employee who has worked continuously for a period of two years acquires the right not to be unfairly dismissed under S94 Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA). Most Employment Tribunal cases concern actual dismissal, where the employer dismisses the employee.

A constructive dismissal occurs when the employee resigns, claiming that the employer’s bad behaviour drove him out. He then invites the Employment Tribunal, to treat his resignation as a dismissal, under S95(1)(c) ERA, by arguing that he had no choice but to resign because of the bad behaviour of the employer. Hence constructive dismissal.

Law in action

A term implied by law into every contract of employment is that both employer and employee will behave in such a way as to enable the employment relationship to work effectively.

To win, Gibbs had to show that Leeds broke the contract and the working relationship. In legal terms, Leeds had committed a ‘repudiatory breach of contract’. For Gibbs, this was easy to prove as cleaning duties did not comprise his job description.

The next step to succeed was that Gibbs had to prove he resigned because of the employer’s breach and not for any other reason, such as another job. Gibbs succeeded here too.

We advise both sides, employers and employees (clubs and/player). It’s constructive to talk to us, before repudiation, on 03454300145.

Related News Stories

Executive faced a ruined career after botched sacking

Executive faced a ruined career after botched sacking

An advanced mental health practitioner was recently awarded over £60,000 after he was sacked without a fair process. An employment…

Read more
CBI scandal: what if your employee is accused of a serious crime?

CBI scandal: what if your employee is accused of a serious crime?

The CBI has been rocked by accusations of rape and sexual misconduct. With its reputation in tatters, members leaving by…

Read more
F-words at work – OK, but saying ‘baldie’ – not

F-words at work – OK, but saying ‘baldie’ – not

Swearing at work was ruled acceptable by one employment tribunal judge, while another gave out £71,000 in compensation when a…

Read more
Employer punished for unfair sex assault dismissal

Employer punished for unfair sex assault dismissal

Government agency bosses used a flawed procedure when firing a top foreign envoy for a sexual harassment accusation. The British…

Read more
Employers face legal traps over home working

Employers face legal traps over home working

Employers risk making poor and costly decisions in response to employees asking to work from their homes. Two cases have…

Read more
Employers are punished for sacking bad workers

Employers are punished for sacking bad workers

A judge slapped down an employer who failed to follow a fair procedure when sacking a nurse for being racist.…

Read more
Managers’ confused performance assessment leads to big payout

Managers’ confused performance assessment leads to big payout

A well-known clothes store's flawed promotion and assessment process landed them with a £96,208 judgement at an employment tribunal. Bristol…

Read more
Frustrated manager’s decision leads to unfair dismissal

Frustrated manager’s decision leads to unfair dismissal

An employer lost an unfair dismissal case after summarily sacking an employee rather than go through a fair procedure. London…

Read more
Protected conversations expedite dismissals

Protected conversations expedite dismissals

The government has increased the scope for employers to sack employees without the threat of court cases. The new law…

Read more
Tesco gets burned by its fire and rehire tactics

Tesco gets burned by its fire and rehire tactics

A high street giant’s attempt to cut their staff bill was slapped down recently due to employment law. The High…

Read more
Tribunal defends  cross-dressing engineer

Tribunal defends cross-dressing engineer

A landmark court ruling has boosted employment lawyers’ chances of protecting ‘sex change’ workers from harassment and unfair dismissal. Birmingham…

Read more
Government demands employees return to work  – but not just yet

Government demands employees return to work – but not just yet

Government have changed their advice on telling employees to return to the workplace due to a spike in virus infections.…

Read more
Job redundancy or unfair dismissal

Job redundancy or unfair dismissal

The looming end to the government’s job subsidies in November will lead to some cynical bosses using redundancy to victimise…

Read more
Sickness sacking is valid without medical expertise

Sickness sacking is valid without medical expertise

A rail company did not need extensive medical evidence to sack an employee for being too sick to work. Employment…

Read more
Court upholds sacking over a Christmas overtime row

Court upholds sacking over a Christmas overtime row

An employment tribunal in November 2016 decided that a company fairly dismissed a worker when her refusal to do overtime…

Read more
Good employer loses appeal in migrant right to work case

Good employer loses appeal in migrant right to work case

Foreign workers have a right to appeal if they face dismissal over doubts about their UK residency status, appeal judges…

Read more
Jaw-jaw before war-war

Jaw-jaw before war-war

New legislation compels people in a workplace dispute to talk before going into legal battle in a court. Whether they…

Read more

    Sharma Solicitors is Regulated by Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA Number: 403199)