Settlement Agreements Solicitors
What is a settlement agreement UK?
A settlement agreement is a deal between an employer and employee that ends a dispute and/or a contract of employment. It means that an employee agrees not to pursue a legal claims against the employer in return for some kind of benefit.
The settlement agreement (also known as a compromise agreement) is a legally binding contract that settles is a full and final settlement of a dispute so that an employment tribunal, on seeing the agreement, would not accept a claim about the dispute by the employee or employer. With or without the support of a specialist employment lawyers, this means the employee cannot lodge an employment tribunal claim for unfair dismissal, constructive dismissal, breach of contract or anything else. The settlement agreement should also resolve a specific dispute or complaint between employer and employee. It has to fit the relevant facts so there is no one-size-fits-all best deal that can be taken off the shelf.
Who can advise on a settlement agreement?
A valid settlement agreement adheres to expert legal advice, can be accepted by an employment tribunal and where the employee has receive independent legal advice.
It is important that the employee seek legal advice from a specialist settlement agreement solicitor. An employment tribunal does not require the employer to have legal advice, but an settlement agreement solicitot would strongly recommend specialist advice for the employer.
How do I get a settlement agreement?
In the last few years, ‘protected conversations’ were introduced so that an employer and employee can start discussions without there being a dispute. But this agreement is not the same as the typical agreement. Protected conversations only relate to typical unfair dismissal claim. They cannot be used to address dismissals that are automatically unfair, such as those involving health and safety, or whistleblowing.
An employer cannot expect conversations to be protected if they engage in ‘inappropriate conduct’ or improper behaviour as part of the drawing up of the agreement. The employer cannot tell the employee to accept the agreement or else they will need to resign or be dismissed. If so, an employee can go to an employment tribunal and claim constructive dismissal.
Why would an employer offer a settlement agreement?
Settlement agreements mean an employer can avoid the publicity, costs or the uncertainty of an employment tribunal.
Larger employers such as banks may offer employment settlement agreement on a routine basis when there is no employment dispute. In such cases, it does not mean that the employer fears legal action in an employment tribunal. Instead, the employer could use the employment settlement agreement to prevent an employee from raising issues after the end of the employment contract.
The settlement agreement sets out the full terms between the parties. It can be used to avoid costly and time-consuming performance, disciplinary or redundancy procedures. It will mean that the employee will receive compensation for losing their job without having to take legal action at an employment tribunal. This could include a tax-free sum, redundancy, holiday entitlement, bonus, other sums and a job reference.
It is important that the employee receives employment law advice from a specialist employment law solicitor. An employment tribunal does not require the employer to have legal advice, but an employment solicitors would strongly recommend specialist advice for the employer.
What must be in a settlement agreement?
A settlement agreement must have conditions that need to be met for it to be legally binding. These conditions are that the:
– agreement must be in writing
– agreement must relate to a particular dispute or complaint
– employee must have received independent legal advice, employment law advice, or settlement agreement advice from a certified and authorised member of a trade union
– an independent adviser must have insurance or professional indemnity to cover any claim against the advice given
– agreement must identify the adviser
– agreement must state that the employment law and other applicable statutory conditions regulating the settlement agreement have been met.
What is a good settlement agreement?
The Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service (Acas) has produced a Code of Practice on Settlement Agreements. This sets out how settlement agreements should operate and also provides best practice on how negotiations should take place. The Code is not legally binding but is recognised by employment tribunals and employers will need to explain to a tribunal why they did not follow it.
What financial payments are included?
A settlement agreement would usually include:
– contractual payments up until the last working day of employment
– payment in lieu of notice
– a separate termination payment, including an ex-gratia payment
– arrangements regarding bonus payments / share schemes/ long-term incentive plans (LTIPs)
– sums covering new clauses of confidentiality and/or post-termination restrictions, and
– all other statutory/contractual claims that might arise in an employment context.
What non-financial terms can be included?
Typically, non-financial terms include: – an agreed reference – a clause that keeps the terms of the agreement confidential – an agreement to not disparage the employer and employee – garden leave – keeping company property like a car or phone – keeping company-funded schemes like private health insurance.
What’s an average settlement agreement pay-out?
The average settlement agreement pay-out is approximately three to six-months salary plus the notice pay (if notice period is not served) and outstanding holidays. Anything above that is a good settlement for the employee and anything below that should be resisted.
Are there minimum pay-outs?
There is no prescribed minimum pay-out. However, employees have a statutory rights to be paid their outstanding holidays and notice pay, if notice is not served out. Of course, if the sum offered in compensation payment is woefully short of what an employee could recover, if they litigated for any of the claims being compromised, then the settlement agreement should be rejected if the offer is not improved.
Are there maximum compensation limits?
There is no maximum and no minimum compensation that is prescribed by law. As a guide, an employee should seek to settle for between three- and six-months salary.
What are the settlement agreement legal costs?
It is usual for the employer to agree to pay at least a proportion of the settlement agreement fees for an independent legal adviser for the employee.
When to make the settlement offer?
An offer of a settlement agreement should be made by an employer just before a dismissal process is started. Ideally, the employer does not want to expend resources undertaking a fair dismissal process and then pay off the employee at the end. The time and effort should be averted by the offer a settlement agreement before the process begins. It should be one or the other, a fair dismissal process or a settlement agreement.
How is a settlement agreement signed?
A settlement agreement is executed by the employee signing at the end and the employee’s solicitor confirming that he/she has advised the employee by also signing the advisor’s certificate.
What happens if I don’t accept a settlement agreement?
If a deal cannot be made, an employment solicitor, or an employee, cannot use, as evidence in an employment tribunal, discussions that takes place to bring about the settlement agreement. Documents, letters and emails connected to these discussions will be labelled ‘without prejudice’. The discussions will be led by expert settlement agreement solicitors on behalf of the employee and cannot be used in any court of law. This allows for frank discussion to take place between employer and employee in order to produce a settlement agreement.
Documents related to the drawing up a settlement agreement may contain the words ‘Subject to contract’. This means that the agreement is not legally binding unless and until there is agreement on the final wording and there is an agreed signed contract. This stops either party saying that there is a binding agreement before the finalisation of the settlement agreement.
In the last few years, ‘protected conversations’ were introduced so that an employer and employee can start discussions about settlement discussions without there being a dispute. But this agreement is not the same as the typical agreement. Protected conversations only relate to typical unfair dismissal claim. They cannot be used to address dismissals that are automatically unfair, such as those involving health and safety, discrimination or whistleblowing.
When does a settlement agreement become binding?
An agreement becomes legally binding when both parties read, sign and date the written legal document. The employee and the independent legal advisor would first sign the settlement agreement. The employer should then sign the agreement.
When is a settlement agreement valid?
An agreement becomes legally binding when both parties read, sign and date the written legal document.
Do you pay tax on a settlement agreement?
The taxation of payments resulting from a settlement agreement can be complex. Payments can be categorised differently and so be subject to different tax rules. So, where payments are a compensation and are £30,000 or less, they are free of income tax and National Insurance contributions.
What different employment rights do employees have?
Employees have a vast range of employment rights, some of which are acquired after a period of service, e.g. unfair dismissal rights acquired after two years of service. Other employee rights include the right not to suffer discrimination and the right not to suffer deductions from wages that an employee has not authorised.
Can the employee’s employment rights be waived in the settlement agreement?
The whole purpose of a settlement agreement is for the employee to waive their employment rights in return for money from the employer.
Can settlement agreements be used for long-term sickness absence?
If an employee is absent because of ill health, a settlement agreement can be arrived at to bring the employee’s employment to an end with a payoff.
Can settlement agreements resolve a disciplinary dispute?
An offer of a settlement agreement can be made by an employer or employee just before a dismissal process is started. From the employer’s point of view he or she does not want to expend resources undertaking a fair dismissal process as a settlement agreement would allow the opportunity to simply pay off the employee. From the employee’s point of view, a settlement agreement brings the matter to a close expeditiously.
Can settlement agreements resolve a performance problem?
An offer of a settlement agreement can be made by an employer or employee just before a performance process is started. From the employer’s point of view he or se does not want to expend resources undertaking a fair dismissal because of poor performance where a settlement agreement would allow the opportunity to simply pay off the employee. From the employee’s point of view, a settlement agreement brings the matter to a close expeditiously.
Can a settlement agreements resolve a grievance dispute?
Often employers offer employees a settlement agreement to bring their employment to an end where employees have lodged a grievance. A settlement agreement then usually leads to the termination of employment with a payoff to the employee.
Is a settlement agreement the same as redundancy?
A redundancy process is one of the lawful ways to dismiss an employee who enjoys the right not to be unfairly dismissed. A settlement agreement is an alternative way to bring employment to an end by mutual agreement.
Can a settlement agreement be used instead of redundancy?
An offer of a settlement agreement can be made by an employer or employee just before a redundancy process is started. From the employer’s point of view he does not want to expend resources undertaking a fair redundancy procedure where a settlement agreement would allow him the opportunity to simply pay off the employee. From the employee’s point of view, a settlement agreement brings the matter to a close expeditiously.
Case study: settlement agreement disputes
It is possible for some settlement agreements to end up with an unfair dismissal or constructive dismissal claim. Some of these can occur due to disputes over ‘without prejudice’ discussions and ‘protected conversations’.
An example was a case involving technical architect, Mr Basra, and his employer Bjss Ltd. Mr Basra began negotiations with his employer in 2016 to avoid a performance procedure. To Bjss’ proposal, Mr Basra responded in an email stating: ‘I accept BJSS’s 3-month offer subject to contract and without prejudice; today will be the last day at BJSS’.
Mr Basra then signed off sick. Bjss wrote to him, terminated his employment and stated that this was mutually agreed. Basra made a claim of unfair dismissal based on the argument that he had not resigned.
The employment tribunal looked at the email but not any other correspondence. They concluded he had resigned at a particular date. The Employment Appeal Tribunal sought to define when the resignation occurred and therefore concluded that negotiations after the resignation could be looked at by a court.
The appeal decision means that an employee claiming constructive dismissal after settlement negotiations cannot use in a court matters discussed during the negotiations that led to a resignation.
Can the agreement be broken?
Either party can make a claim at a county court if the other has breached the agreement.
If a settlement is reached during a tribunal hearing, the tribunal can put a hold on the claim for a period of time. This claim can then be revived if the other party does not fulfil their part of the agreement within that time.
News stories related to settlement agreements
‘Tis the season to be agreeable…
Employers cannot now use settlement agreements to stop any future case against them, according to a new tribunal decision. In November 2022, when reviewing the case, Technip Singapore PTE Limited (Technip) v Bathgate, an Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) ruled that a settlement agreement had to specify a particular claim in order to prevent an employee …
Protected conversations expedite dismissals
The government has increased the scope for employers to sack employees without the threat of court cases. The new law replaces ‘compromise agreements’ with ‘settlement agreements‘ but keeps a rule where an employer and employee can strike a bargain to end employment or give up other employment rights. As is typical, the employee surrenders the …
Continue reading “Protected conversations expedite dismissals”
Drop in redundancy numbers predicted to end
The number of employers making workers redundant each month declined for over a year, according to government statistics published on 6 August. Insolvency Service data shows that in June 2020, 1,289 employers made 155,576 redundancies and by July this year, 142 bosses made 14,078 employees redundant. The Service released figures from its Advanced Notification of …
Continue reading “Drop in redundancy numbers predicted to end”
Can Settlement Agreements rescue businesses facing COVID-19 redundancies?
There is a way for employers to make redundancies to survive the COVID economic hit and avoid legal hassles that come with it. Good employment law solicitors point to a special arrangement called Settlement Agreements. Despite the promise of vaccines, the need to find alternatives to redundancies are clear. Employers are considering redundancies due to …
Continue reading “Can Settlement Agreements rescue businesses facing COVID-19 redundancies?”
Employers facing down coronavirus redundancies
The BBC reported on 1 July 2020 that employers had announced over 12,000 coronavirus redundancies. Redundancies driven by a coronavirus downturn in business are fraught with legal danger. Recently, the Equality and Human Rights Commission published advice for employers about coronavirus redundancies resulting from the withdrawal of the government’s salary subsidy scheme. Government’s coronavirus advice …
Continue reading “Employers facing down coronavirus redundancies”
Gagging clauses are good
A tidal wave of public opinion is threatening to derail confidentiality agreements between employees and employers that can be in the interests of both. Prime Minister Theresa May told the House of Commons in October 2018 that the government would act on employers’ alleged abuse of confidentiality or non-disclosure agreements. The moral panic is about …
To speak to an employment law specialist about your case, call us on 0345 430 0145 or contact us online.