Unfair dismissal solicitors

unfair dismissal solicitors

What is unfair dismissal?

An employment tribunal will accept an employer sacking an employee if it can be shown that the employee has failed and will continue to fail to fulfil the employment contract. But employment law advice is not that simple. Ending a contract of an employee with two years’ service can break the Employment Rights Act 1996 and an employment tribunal may judge the sacking as unfair dismissal or wrongful dismissal.

Can you claim for unfair dismissal with less than 2 years’ service?

In most circumstances the employee can claim for unfair dismissal once they have reached a qualifying period of two years’ service.

However, it will be unfair dismissal at any time, whether or not the employee has two years’ service, if it concerns the employee’s ‘protected characteristics’ such as race or gender, as laid out in employment law.

Fair procedure

Employment Solicitors gives legal advice to an employer that they need to have justifiable reasons and go through a fair procedure for the sacking to be lawful and to avoid unfair dismissal claims.

Employment solicitors would point out that a sacking satisfies the correct procedure if the employer:

  • – used sacking as the last resort
  • – carried out an investigation as soon as reasonable to determine the facts
  • – used a fair and consistent procedure when dismissing employees
  • – set out the rules and disciplinary procedures in writing
  • – ensured that managers and employees understand the disciplinary rules, and
  • – sought to resolve any problems informally.

If it is clear to an employment tribunal that an employer has not treated the employee in a comparable way to other employees, then the sacking is likely to be judged as unlawful dismissal.

What are the ’5 fair reasons’ for dismissal?

An employment solicitor dealing with unfair dismissal would advise that there are five fair reasons for dismissal that would be recognised by an employment tribunal hearing.  These are:

  • – poor conduct – when the employee has done something unacceptable in the workplace or strongly related to the workplace,
  • – lack of capability – when the employee does not have the skills or qualifications to do the job or simply cannot do the job,
  • redundancy – when there are business reasons to eliminate an employee’s job
  • – legal reason – when the employee cannot do their job legally, for example a lorry driver who is banned from driving,
  • – ‘some other substantial reason’ – a term used for a wide variety of other situations, including:

i a fixed-term contract ending,

ii third party pressure, such as if a client refuses to work with the employee,

iii. the employee refusing to agree to new terms and conditions.

Can I be sacked without a written warning?

An employer can immediately sack an employee on the grounds of gross misconduct. An employment law solicitor would advise that an employer should be able to argue that the gross misconduct was either serious or has serious consequences. This is particularly so for an employee’s use of violence in the workplace or an employee has seriously breached reasonable policies.

Gross misconduct could include:

  • – criminal conduct in the workplace, such as fraud,
  • – physical violence,
  • – knowing that they could and should have carried out important duties and failed to do   so,
  • – serious insubordination, such as refusing to carry out an instruction that was in line the  employment contract.

Both employers and employees can suggest ending a workplace dispute through a settlement agreement. This agreement means that an employee gives up most legal rights to litigate about the ending of an employment contract on the basis that the employee receives benefits, usually, but not exclusively, financial.

Automatic unfair dismissal

Some reasons are automatically unfair. It is unfair dismissal if an employer sacks an employee because they were:

  • – pregnant, including all reasons relating to maternity
  • – on family leave, including maternity leave, parental leave, paternity leave, adoption leave or for time off for dependents
  • – acting as an employee representative
  • – acting as a trade union representative
  • – acting as an occupational pension scheme trustee
  • – joining or not joining a trade union
  • – a part-time or fixed-term employee
  • – pay and working hours, including the Working Time Regulations, annual leave and the     National Minimum Wage, and
  • – whistleblowing.

An employment tribunal makes a judgment about a dismissal by examining whether a fair procedure was followed.

What is constructive dismissal?

Constructive dismissal can also constitute unfair dismissal. If an employer seriously breaches the employment contract in order to force an employee to leave, then this amounts to constructive dismissal. In such a case, an employee should be able to show that they did not accept the breach and genuinely felt they were forced to leave. Unfair dismissal applies to full-time and part-time workers.

Examples of a serious breach leading to constructive dismissal include not paying the employee properly, demotion or bullying.

What is wrongful dismissal?

Wrongful dismissal can be claimed when an employer has breached an employee’s contract.

This could be when an employer has sacked an employee without giving them a notice period or notice pay,  or not given the full notice period they are entitled to.

An employee can claim unfair dismissal at any time, regardless of how long they have worked for their employer.

Can I be sacked for no reason?

An employment solicitors would advise an employer to give reasons for a dismissal in writing. An employer should also outline when the employment contract ends, what their notice period is, if there is one and how they can appeal the decision. An employee has the legal right to receive in writing within 14 days the reasons for dismissal.

Example: Gross misconduct sacking

A large company was on the wrong side of the law after sacking a good worker for gross misconduct.

Robert Newbold, a penstock co-ordinator, with a 34-year unblemished work record, was unfairly dismissed by Thames Water for breaching health and safety rules. Thames Water concluded that he and a colleague put their own lives at risk after entering a sewer without wearing the proper protective equipment.

An Employment Tribunal judged that even though the employees had contributed to their own sacking, dismissal was outside the ‘range of reasonable responses’ to their transgression.

Thames  Water took the case to the Court of Appeal in 2011 but the tribunal decision against them was upheld.

Both the tribunal and appeal court looked at Robert Newbold’s record and what Thames Water could have done about the transgression.

At one end of the range of responses was a strict employer who would sack an employee for misconduct. At the other, a lenient employer offering another chance. If the employer’s penalty of dismissal fell anywhere within the range, the dismissal would be fair. In this case, a single act of misconduct in an otherwise unblemished career, fell outside the range of reasonable responses.

The appeal court reduced the compensation that Thames Water had to pay to £54,197.84.

How can I claim for unfair dismissal or constructive dismissal?

Contact us for legal advice if you are an employee about how much you can get for unfair dismissal, and to discuss your case. We can discuss your employment rights and help you through the process for unfair dismissal or constructive unfair dismissal, to get the claim compensation you deserve.

Advice for employers

If you are an employer we can give legal advise you on all aspects of UK employment law, to protect you from costly employment tribunals.

News stories related to unfair dismissal

Employer punished for unfair sex assault dismissal

Government agency bosses used a flawed procedure when firing a top foreign envoy for a sexual harassment accusation. The British Council ended up with a £300,000 award against them at London Central employment tribunal in November 2021 because of the unfair dismissal of their Italian director, Paul Sellers. The Council dismissed him in May 2019 …

Employers face legal traps over home working

Employers risk making poor and costly decisions in response to employees asking to work from their homes. Two cases have shown managers losing employment tribunal claims because of their unfair treatment of staff wanting to work out of office. Cubitt Town Infants’ School was recently ordered to pay £17,000 to their former teaching assistant, Abi …

Employers are punished for sacking bad workers

A judge slapped down an employer who failed to follow a fair procedure when sacking a nurse for being racist. In another case, where an employee missed over 800 of his shifts, an employer also shot themselves in the foot for not knowing about the importance of having a fair procedure. After a hearing in …

Managers’ confused performance assessment leads to big payout

A well-known clothes store’s flawed promotion and assessment process landed them with a £96,208 judgement at an employment tribunal. Bristol employment tribunal upheld the claim of 56-year-old knitwear designer Rachel Sunderland that Superdry Plc discriminated against her because of her age and subjected her to unfair dismissal. Rachel Sunderland was a respected specialist from September …

Frustrated manager’s decision leads to unfair dismissal

An employer lost an unfair dismissal case after summarily sacking an employee rather than go through a fair procedure. London Central Employment Tribunal found in favour of the unfair dismissal claim against plant and pet retailer, M G Seven by delivery driver, Andrew Harris. In his judgement, Employment Judge Adkin cut Harris’s compensation award because …

Protected conversations expedite dismissals

The government has increased the scope for employers to sack employees without the threat of court cases. The new law replaces ‘compromise agreements’ with ‘settlement agreements‘ but keeps a rule where an employer and employee can strike a bargain to end employment or give up other employment rights. As is typical, the employee surrenders the …

Tesco gets burned by its fire and rehire tactics

A high street giant’s attempt to cut their staff bill was slapped down recently due to employment law. The High Court ruled against Tesco when it tried to reduce the terms and conditions of some of its workers. Their tactic was to fire and then rehire workers on new, less favourable employment contracts. To stop …

Tribunal defends cross-dressing engineer

A landmark court ruling has boosted employment lawyers’ chances of protecting ‘sex change’ workers from harassment and unfair dismissal. Birmingham Employment Tribunal ruled that a ‘gender fluid’ worker, Ms Rose Taylor, suffered direct discrimination, victimisation, harassment and constructive dismissal at Jaguar Land Rover Ltd. Rose Taylor was in a process of changing from male to …

Government demands employees return to work – but not just yet

Government have changed their advice on telling employees to return to the workplace due to a spike in virus infections. The government was urging employees to start working normally, plus including special health measures in the workplace, but since 22 September are telling employees to work from home if they can. The government is changing their …

Job redundancy or unfair dismissal

The looming end to the government’s job subsidies in November will lead to some cynical bosses using redundancy to victimise and sack workers. To deal with this, employees and employers need redundancy advice that clearly defines what is a job redundancy and what is not. Around 1.3 million people could face joblessness in the short …

Sickness sacking is valid without medical expertise

A rail company did not need extensive medical evidence to sack an employee for being too sick to work. Employment appeal judges said that an employer needed the same level of evidence used to sack workers for poor behaviour. The judges’ ruling concerned Mr. Doolan, a manager, and his initially successful claim for unfair dismissal …

Court upholds sacking over a Christmas overtime row

An employment tribunal in November 2016 decided that a company fairly dismissed a worker when her refusal to do overtime for Christmas could have sparked a staff rebellion. In Edwards v Bramble Foods Ltd, the tribunal heard that employee, Mrs. Edwards, refused Saturday work when the rest of the workforce agreed. The small food company …

Good employer loses appeal in migrant right to work case

Foreign workers have a right to appeal if they face dismissal over doubts about their UK residency status, appeal judges ruled. The Employment Appeal Tribunal made a ruling in an unfair dismissal case brought by Pakistani worker, Fahim Afzal, against his employers, a Dominos Pizza delivery franchise. Judges ruled that the franchisee, East London Pizza, …

Jaw-jaw before war-war

New legislation compels people in a workplace dispute to talk before going into legal battle in a court. Whether they like it or not, both employers and employees must go into mediation before the employee can lodge an employment tribunal claim. The mediation, officially known as Early Conciliation, is conducted by ACAS under new powers …

Contact Us

 

To speak to an employment law specialist about your case, call us on 0345 430 0145 or contact us online.

Experienced team of employment solicitors

Representing employers and employees, including senior executives

Advice in plain English

Office in London, operation nationwide

Sharma Solicitors is Regulated by Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA Number: 403199)