Good employer loses appeal in migrant right to work case

18 Jul 2018
by

Foreign workers have a right to appeal if they face dismissal over doubts about their UK residency status, appeal judges ruled.

The Employment Appeal Tribunal made a ruling in an unfair dismissal case brought by Pakistani worker, Fahim Afzal, against his employers, a Dominos Pizza delivery franchise.

Judges ruled that the franchisee, East London Pizza, should have given Mr. Afzal an appeal against being dismissed for not showing that his limited leave to remain had been extended.

Managers sacked him in August 2016 because they feared receiving penalties under the 2006 Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act for employing a migrant with no right to work. Yet, the appeal court found that their letter of dismissal had offered no appeal process.

Mr. Afzal had applied to the Home Office to extend his stay the day before his visa ran out on 12 August. He copied his application in an email to his boss but for technical reasons the attachment could not be opened.

Good employment practices

Mr. Afzal brought a case to the employment tribunal yet the court found in favour of East London Pizza. The employment judge found that the company had good employment practices, Fahim did not have the right to stay and there was no case for a rethink by the employer.

The main issue for the tribunal judge was that it was reasonable for the employer to believe that after the 12 August, Fahim’s chance to extend his stay had gone.

Yet, the appeal judges ruled that there had been an error of law and Mr. Afzal should have been given the chance to prove he could have remained.

The appeal judges, though, did not reverse any other tribunal findings, including the dismissal. The case will go back to the employment tribunal for a final ruling.

In general, employers can confirm the status of a foreign worker at the Employer Checking Service. An employer has 28 days from the date a worker’s visa or right to work expires to obtain a status notification from the Service.

Tagged

appeal employment law immigration right to work tribunal

Related News Stories

Executive faced a ruined career after botched sacking

Executive faced a ruined career after botched sacking

An advanced mental health practitioner was recently awarded over £60,000 after he was sacked without a fair process. An employment…

Read more
CBI scandal: what if your employee is accused of a serious crime?

CBI scandal: what if your employee is accused of a serious crime?

The CBI has been rocked by accusations of rape and sexual misconduct. With its reputation in tatters, members leaving by…

Read more
F-words at work – OK, but saying ‘baldie’ – not

F-words at work – OK, but saying ‘baldie’ – not

Swearing at work was ruled acceptable by one employment tribunal judge, while another gave out £71,000 in compensation when a…

Read more
Employer punished for unfair sex assault dismissal

Employer punished for unfair sex assault dismissal

Government agency bosses used a flawed procedure when firing a top foreign envoy for a sexual harassment accusation. The British…

Read more
Employers face legal traps over home working

Employers face legal traps over home working

Employers risk making poor and costly decisions in response to employees asking to work from their homes. Two cases have…

Read more
Employers are punished for sacking bad workers

Employers are punished for sacking bad workers

A judge slapped down an employer who failed to follow a fair procedure when sacking a nurse for being racist.…

Read more
Managers’ confused performance assessment leads to big payout

Managers’ confused performance assessment leads to big payout

A well-known clothes store's flawed promotion and assessment process landed them with a £96,208 judgement at an employment tribunal. Bristol…

Read more
Frustrated manager’s decision leads to unfair dismissal

Frustrated manager’s decision leads to unfair dismissal

An employer lost an unfair dismissal case after summarily sacking an employee rather than go through a fair procedure. London…

Read more
Protected conversations expedite dismissals

Protected conversations expedite dismissals

The government has increased the scope for employers to sack employees without the threat of court cases. The new law…

Read more
Tesco gets burned by its fire and rehire tactics

Tesco gets burned by its fire and rehire tactics

A high street giant’s attempt to cut their staff bill was slapped down recently due to employment law. The High…

Read more
Tribunal defends  cross-dressing engineer

Tribunal defends cross-dressing engineer

A landmark court ruling has boosted employment lawyers’ chances of protecting ‘sex change’ workers from harassment and unfair dismissal. Birmingham…

Read more
Government demands employees return to work  – but not just yet

Government demands employees return to work – but not just yet

Government have changed their advice on telling employees to return to the workplace due to a spike in virus infections.…

Read more
Job redundancy or unfair dismissal

Job redundancy or unfair dismissal

The looming end to the government’s job subsidies in November will lead to some cynical bosses using redundancy to victimise…

Read more
Sickness sacking is valid without medical expertise

Sickness sacking is valid without medical expertise

A rail company did not need extensive medical evidence to sack an employee for being too sick to work. Employment…

Read more
Court upholds sacking over a Christmas overtime row

Court upholds sacking over a Christmas overtime row

An employment tribunal in November 2016 decided that a company fairly dismissed a worker when her refusal to do overtime…

Read more
Jaw-jaw before war-war

Jaw-jaw before war-war

New legislation compels people in a workplace dispute to talk before going into legal battle in a court. Whether they…

Read more

    Sharma Solicitors is Regulated by Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA Number: 403199)