Tesco gets burned by its fire and rehire tactics

14 Feb 2022
by Sharma Solicitors
Unfair dismissal, fire and rehire

A high street giant’s attempt to cut their staff bill was slapped down recently due to employment law.

The High Court ruled against Tesco when it tried to reduce the terms and conditions of some of its workers.

Their tactic was to fire and then rehire workers on new, less favourable employment contracts.

To stop them, 42 workers at Tesco’s distribution centres in Daventry and Lichfield banded together with their shop workers union, Usdaw, who made use of employment law advice.

The High Court heard that Tesco had given the workers a special, top-up payment called ‘retained pay’. The supermarket introduced the top up to keep employees in their company.

Yet, Tesco’s new employment contracts excluded the special payment.

The High Court also heard that Tesco had made commitments to staff who had worked during the lockdown.

 

Unfair dismissal

The court agreed that in those special circumstances, Tesco could not use fire and rehire tactics just because it was convenient for them.

Employment lawyers persuaded the court that the payment was an ‘implied contractual term’ and so firing them to remove it amounted to unfair dismissal.

Usdaw was concerned that firing and rehiring staff on less favourable terms was widespread over the last 18 months.

They are worried that employers were eroding hard won employment rights that were protecting low-paid workers.

Tesco said that most of the 1,600 people working in their distribution section do not receive the payment and they made offers to their employees to phase it out.

They are considering making an appeal against the High Court ruling.

Photo credit: Nick Youngson

 

Tagged

employment contract Employment Tribunal pay unfair dismissal

Related News Stories

Executive faced a ruined career after botched sacking

Executive faced a ruined career after botched sacking

An advanced mental health practitioner was recently awarded over £60,000 after he was sacked without a fair process. An employment…

Read more
CBI scandal: what if your employee is accused of a serious crime?

CBI scandal: what if your employee is accused of a serious crime?

The CBI has been rocked by accusations of rape and sexual misconduct. With its reputation in tatters, members leaving by…

Read more
F-words at work – OK, but saying ‘baldie’ – not

F-words at work – OK, but saying ‘baldie’ – not

Swearing at work was ruled acceptable by one employment tribunal judge, while another gave out £71,000 in compensation when a…

Read more
Employer punished for unfair sex assault dismissal

Employer punished for unfair sex assault dismissal

Government agency bosses used a flawed procedure when firing a top foreign envoy for a sexual harassment accusation. The British…

Read more
Employers face legal traps over home working

Employers face legal traps over home working

Employers risk making poor and costly decisions in response to employees asking to work from their homes. Two cases have…

Read more
Employers are punished for sacking bad workers

Employers are punished for sacking bad workers

A judge slapped down an employer who failed to follow a fair procedure when sacking a nurse for being racist.…

Read more
Managers’ confused performance assessment leads to big payout

Managers’ confused performance assessment leads to big payout

A well-known clothes store's flawed promotion and assessment process landed them with a £96,208 judgement at an employment tribunal. Bristol…

Read more
Frustrated manager’s decision leads to unfair dismissal

Frustrated manager’s decision leads to unfair dismissal

An employer lost an unfair dismissal case after summarily sacking an employee rather than go through a fair procedure. London…

Read more
Protected conversations expedite dismissals

Protected conversations expedite dismissals

The government has increased the scope for employers to sack employees without the threat of court cases. The new law…

Read more
Tribunal defends  cross-dressing engineer

Tribunal defends cross-dressing engineer

A landmark court ruling has boosted employment lawyers’ chances of protecting ‘sex change’ workers from harassment and unfair dismissal. Birmingham…

Read more
Government demands employees return to work  – but not just yet

Government demands employees return to work – but not just yet

Government have changed their advice on telling employees to return to the workplace due to a spike in virus infections.…

Read more
Job redundancy or unfair dismissal

Job redundancy or unfair dismissal

The looming end to the government’s job subsidies in November will lead to some cynical bosses using redundancy to victimise…

Read more
Sickness sacking is valid without medical expertise

Sickness sacking is valid without medical expertise

A rail company did not need extensive medical evidence to sack an employee for being too sick to work. Employment…

Read more
Court upholds sacking over a Christmas overtime row

Court upholds sacking over a Christmas overtime row

An employment tribunal in November 2016 decided that a company fairly dismissed a worker when her refusal to do overtime…

Read more
Good employer loses appeal in migrant right to work case

Good employer loses appeal in migrant right to work case

Foreign workers have a right to appeal if they face dismissal over doubts about their UK residency status, appeal judges…

Read more
Jaw-jaw before war-war

Jaw-jaw before war-war

New legislation compels people in a workplace dispute to talk before going into legal battle in a court. Whether they…

Read more

    Sharma Solicitors is Regulated by Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA Number: 403199)