Tesco gets burned by its fire and rehire tactics
A high street giant’s attempt to cut their staff bill was slapped down recently due to employment law.
The High Court ruled against Tesco when it tried to reduce the terms and conditions of some of its workers.
Their tactic was to fire and then rehire workers on new, less favourable employment contracts.
To stop them, 42 workers at Tesco’s distribution centres in Daventry and Lichfield banded together with their shop workers union, Usdaw, who made use of employment law advice.
The High Court heard that Tesco had given the workers a special, top-up payment called ‘retained pay’. The supermarket introduced the top up to keep employees in their company.
Yet, Tesco’s new employment contracts excluded the special payment.
The High Court also heard that Tesco had made commitments to staff who had worked during the lockdown.
Unfair dismissal
The court agreed that in those special circumstances, Tesco could not use fire and rehire tactics just because it was convenient for them.
Employment lawyers persuaded the court that the payment was an ‘implied contractual term’ and so firing them to remove it amounted to unfair dismissal.
Usdaw was concerned that firing and rehiring staff on less favourable terms was widespread over the last 18 months.
They are worried that employers were eroding hard won employment rights that were protecting low-paid workers.
Tesco said that most of the 1,600 people working in their distribution section do not receive the payment and they made offers to their employees to phase it out.
They are considering making an appeal against the High Court ruling.
Photo credit: Nick Youngson
Related News Stories
An advanced mental health practitioner was recently awarded over £60,000 after he was sacked without a fair process. An employment…
The CBI has been rocked by accusations of rape and sexual misconduct. With its reputation in tatters, members leaving by…
Swearing at work was ruled acceptable by one employment tribunal judge, while another gave out £71,000 in compensation when a…
Government agency bosses used a flawed procedure when firing a top foreign envoy for a sexual harassment accusation. The British…
Employers risk making poor and costly decisions in response to employees asking to work from their homes. Two cases have…
A judge slapped down an employer who failed to follow a fair procedure when sacking a nurse for being racist.…
A well-known clothes store's flawed promotion and assessment process landed them with a £96,208 judgement at an employment tribunal. Bristol…
An employer lost an unfair dismissal case after summarily sacking an employee rather than go through a fair procedure. London…
The government has increased the scope for employers to sack employees without the threat of court cases. The new law…
A landmark court ruling has boosted employment lawyers’ chances of protecting ‘sex change’ workers from harassment and unfair dismissal. Birmingham…
Government have changed their advice on telling employees to return to the workplace due to a spike in virus infections.…
The looming end to the government’s job subsidies in November will lead to some cynical bosses using redundancy to victimise…
A rail company did not need extensive medical evidence to sack an employee for being too sick to work. Employment…
An employment tribunal in November 2016 decided that a company fairly dismissed a worker when her refusal to do overtime…
Foreign workers have a right to appeal if they face dismissal over doubts about their UK residency status, appeal judges…
New legislation compels people in a workplace dispute to talk before going into legal battle in a court. Whether they…
