" "

Employer punished for unfair sex assault dismissal

3 Oct 2022
by Sharma Solicitors
fair procedure, dismissal, grievance

Government agency bosses used a flawed procedure when firing a top foreign envoy for a sexual harassment accusation.

The British Council ended up with a £300,000 award against them at London Central employment tribunal in November 2021 because of the unfair dismissal of their Italian director, Paul Sellers.

The Council dismissed him in May 2019 after investigating an accusation of sexual assault. He was accused of unwanted kissing and fondling the breasts of a British embassy employee at a private party.

But after Paul Sellers lodged an unfair dismissal claim, the employment tribunal ordered compensation and instructed the British Council to re-employ him.

In a written judgement, Employment Judge Hodgson gave a series of reasons for finding the dismissal unfair. He stated:

‘Moreover, given the nature of the penalty, and the potential effect on the claimant’s future employment, rejecting compelling relevant evidence summarily when the respondent own procedure would have allowed the matter to be reopened is not fair. No reasonable employer would have behaved in that way.’

Employment tribunal claim

Judge Hodgson quoted ACAS guidance on Handling a Sexual Harassment Complaint and stated that such a complaint should be investigated even if there were no witnesses.

He also said the guidance stresses the importance of keeping an open mind, and equal treatment of both the complainant and accused.

He went on to criticise how the British Council dealt with Mr. Sellers’ case.

He was surprised about the rejection of compelling evidence from a witness who saw how ZZ behaved toward Mr. Sellers at the end of the party. The judge saw no rational basis for continuing with the complaint after hearing the witness’ account.

He also criticised the rejection by the Council of other witnesses who claimed they would have seen any assault.

Judge Hodgson noted that the British Council’s investigation included a careful examination of Mr. Sellers’ testimony but not of the accuser’s, known as ‘ZZ’ to preserve her anonymity. He also pointed out that the Council accepted ZZ’s accusation without question.

Other problems with the investigation included:

  • – depending on the investigators’ feeling about the complaint
  • – failure to seek corroboration for the accusation
  • – bias against Mr. Sellers by officials involved in the investigation.

Mr. Sellers had worked in Italy from 2014 and began his work with the Council in 1990.

Tagged

employment law Employment Tribunal fair procedure sexual assault unfair dismissal

Related News Stories

Executive faced a ruined career after botched sacking

Executive faced a ruined career after botched sacking

An advanced mental health practitioner was recently awarded over £60,000 after he was sacked without a fair process. An employment…

Read more
CBI scandal: what if your employee is accused of a serious crime?

CBI scandal: what if your employee is accused of a serious crime?

The CBI has been rocked by accusations of rape and sexual misconduct. With its reputation in tatters, members leaving by…

Read more
F-words at work – OK, but saying ‘baldie’ – not

F-words at work – OK, but saying ‘baldie’ – not

Swearing at work was ruled acceptable by one employment tribunal judge, while another gave out £71,000 in compensation when a…

Read more
Employers face legal traps over home working

Employers face legal traps over home working

Employers risk making poor and costly decisions in response to employees asking to work from their homes. Two cases have…

Read more
Employers are punished for sacking bad workers

Employers are punished for sacking bad workers

A judge slapped down an employer who failed to follow a fair procedure when sacking a nurse for being racist.…

Read more
Managers’ confused performance assessment leads to big payout

Managers’ confused performance assessment leads to big payout

A well-known clothes store's flawed promotion and assessment process landed them with a £96,208 judgement at an employment tribunal. Bristol…

Read more
Frustrated manager’s decision leads to unfair dismissal

Frustrated manager’s decision leads to unfair dismissal

An employer lost an unfair dismissal case after summarily sacking an employee rather than go through a fair procedure. London…

Read more
Protected conversations expedite dismissals

Protected conversations expedite dismissals

The government has increased the scope for employers to sack employees without the threat of court cases. The new law…

Read more
Tesco gets burned by its fire and rehire tactics

Tesco gets burned by its fire and rehire tactics

A high street giant’s attempt to cut their staff bill was slapped down recently due to employment law. The High…

Read more
Tribunal defends  cross-dressing engineer

Tribunal defends cross-dressing engineer

A landmark court ruling has boosted employment lawyers’ chances of protecting ‘sex change’ workers from harassment and unfair dismissal. Birmingham…

Read more
Government demands employees return to work  – but not just yet

Government demands employees return to work – but not just yet

Government have changed their advice on telling employees to return to the workplace due to a spike in virus infections.…

Read more
Job redundancy or unfair dismissal

Job redundancy or unfair dismissal

The looming end to the government’s job subsidies in November will lead to some cynical bosses using redundancy to victimise…

Read more
Sickness sacking is valid without medical expertise

Sickness sacking is valid without medical expertise

A rail company did not need extensive medical evidence to sack an employee for being too sick to work. Employment…

Read more
Court upholds sacking over a Christmas overtime row

Court upholds sacking over a Christmas overtime row

An employment tribunal in November 2016 decided that a company fairly dismissed a worker when her refusal to do overtime…

Read more
Good employer loses appeal in migrant right to work case

Good employer loses appeal in migrant right to work case

Foreign workers have a right to appeal if they face dismissal over doubts about their UK residency status, appeal judges…

Read more
Jaw-jaw before war-war

Jaw-jaw before war-war

New legislation compels people in a workplace dispute to talk before going into legal battle in a court. Whether they…

Read more
Sharma Solicitors is Regulated by Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA Number: 403199)