" "

Employers are punished for sacking bad workers

1 Aug 2022
by Sharma Solicitors
stress conflict unfair dismissal

A judge slapped down an employer who failed to follow a fair procedure when sacking a nurse for being racist.

In another case, where an employee missed over 800 of his shifts, an employer also shot themselves in the foot for not knowing about the importance of having a fair procedure.

After a hearing in September 2021, East Midlands employment tribunal awarded mental health nurse, Susan Brennan, 67, £5,387.25 because her dismissal and appeal were not conducted fairly.

Social enterprise Navigo Health and Social Care CIC sacked the nurse in December 2019 for gross misconduct because she constantly made racist remarks about African nurses she worked with.

The tribunal found that Susan Brennan had complained about the social enterprise hiring African nurses. Her remarks included:

  • “this is our hard-earned NHS money bringing these over”,
  • “have you come to play spot the white person” and
  • “have you seen this, I’m the only white person on”.

 

Unfair dismissal

But the enterprise’s sacking procedure was not fair. Employment Judge Rachel Broughton explained that had there been a reasonable investigation and an approach to the evidence, which was within the band of reasonable responses, the outcome may not have been  dismissal. However, the claimant’s conduct was blameworthy and did contribute to the Tribunal finding of the termination of her employment. The claimant must take some responsibility for the consequences of her behaviour and thus for the dismissal.

 

Fair procedure

Another unfair procedure case involved a multinational company that sacked a worker whose absence cost them an estimated £95,850.

In September 2020, an employment tribunal found car manufacturer Jaguar Land Rover responsible for unfair dismissal, after the employee missed 808 of his shifts.

Sacked car assembly worker, Vic Rumbold during his 20-year employment was ill and his sickness meant he missed 808 of his shifts.

Manager Jon Carter told the tribunal that their investigation into employee, Vic Rumbold, identified conduct issues. But he said it was Rumbold’s capability due to his sickness that led to his dismissal on 7 December 2018.

The tribunal concluded that the employers did not properly use their own procedure and instead saw an opportunity to sack Rumbold.

They judged that sacking was not in the range of reasonable responses that was open to Land Rover.

Land Rover had recently updated their absence management procedure that set out the role of occupational health, managers and employers and also warnings and a final employment review.

Yet, when problems first arose, managers did not apply the procedures they had.

There was no dispute about Rumbold’s absences and their cost in sick pay.

Tagged

human resources race discrimination sacking sick leave unfair dismissal

Related News Stories

Executive faced a ruined career after botched sacking

Executive faced a ruined career after botched sacking

An advanced mental health practitioner was recently awarded over £60,000 after he was sacked without a fair process. An employment…

Read more
CBI scandal: what if your employee is accused of a serious crime?

CBI scandal: what if your employee is accused of a serious crime?

The CBI has been rocked by accusations of rape and sexual misconduct. With its reputation in tatters, members leaving by…

Read more
F-words at work – OK, but saying ‘baldie’ – not

F-words at work – OK, but saying ‘baldie’ – not

Swearing at work was ruled acceptable by one employment tribunal judge, while another gave out £71,000 in compensation when a…

Read more
Employer punished for unfair sex assault dismissal

Employer punished for unfair sex assault dismissal

Government agency bosses used a flawed procedure when firing a top foreign envoy for a sexual harassment accusation. The British…

Read more
Employers face legal traps over home working

Employers face legal traps over home working

Employers risk making poor and costly decisions in response to employees asking to work from their homes. Two cases have…

Read more
Managers’ confused performance assessment leads to big payout

Managers’ confused performance assessment leads to big payout

A well-known clothes store's flawed promotion and assessment process landed them with a £96,208 judgement at an employment tribunal. Bristol…

Read more
Frustrated manager’s decision leads to unfair dismissal

Frustrated manager’s decision leads to unfair dismissal

An employer lost an unfair dismissal case after summarily sacking an employee rather than go through a fair procedure. London…

Read more
Protected conversations expedite dismissals

Protected conversations expedite dismissals

The government has increased the scope for employers to sack employees without the threat of court cases. The new law…

Read more
Tesco gets burned by its fire and rehire tactics

Tesco gets burned by its fire and rehire tactics

A high street giant’s attempt to cut their staff bill was slapped down recently due to employment law. The High…

Read more
Tribunal defends  cross-dressing engineer

Tribunal defends cross-dressing engineer

A landmark court ruling has boosted employment lawyers’ chances of protecting ‘sex change’ workers from harassment and unfair dismissal. Birmingham…

Read more
Government demands employees return to work  – but not just yet

Government demands employees return to work – but not just yet

Government have changed their advice on telling employees to return to the workplace due to a spike in virus infections.…

Read more
Job redundancy or unfair dismissal

Job redundancy or unfair dismissal

The looming end to the government’s job subsidies in November will lead to some cynical bosses using redundancy to victimise…

Read more
Sickness sacking is valid without medical expertise

Sickness sacking is valid without medical expertise

A rail company did not need extensive medical evidence to sack an employee for being too sick to work. Employment…

Read more
Court upholds sacking over a Christmas overtime row

Court upholds sacking over a Christmas overtime row

An employment tribunal in November 2016 decided that a company fairly dismissed a worker when her refusal to do overtime…

Read more
Good employer loses appeal in migrant right to work case

Good employer loses appeal in migrant right to work case

Foreign workers have a right to appeal if they face dismissal over doubts about their UK residency status, appeal judges…

Read more
Jaw-jaw before war-war

Jaw-jaw before war-war

New legislation compels people in a workplace dispute to talk before going into legal battle in a court. Whether they…

Read more

    Sharma Solicitors is Regulated by Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA Number: 403199)