" "

Employers face legal traps over home working

5 Sep 2022
by Sharma Solicitors
home working

Employers risk making poor and costly decisions in response to employees asking to work from their homes.

Two cases have shown managers losing employment tribunal claims because of their unfair treatment of staff wanting to work out of office.

Cubitt Town Infants’ School was recently ordered to pay £17,000 to their former teaching assistant, Abi Balogun, by East London Employment Tribunal. The school had rejected her home working request while at the same time approving requests from her colleagues.

In another case, London Central Employment Tribunal upheld unfair dismissal and discrimination claims by a senior lending manager against Nationwide Building Association.

Abi Balogun wanted to do her work in special needs and disabilities from home in January 2021. She wanted to be able to support her young son who had cancer.

When Abi asked, head teacher, Emmy Alcock told her that she was not clinically vulnerable and said she had to either go into work or not get paid.

Abi then asked her why was it that a less qualified, white teaching assistant was allowed to work from home. Abi was then sacked.

She lodged an employment tribunal claim that included unfair dismissal, race discrimination and victimisation. She lost the unfair dismissal claim because she worked for an agency, but won the other claims.

Indirect sex discrimination

Meanwhile, Nationwide Building Association failed to correct problems in their home working policy that led to disadvantage among women with care giving responsibilities.

They turned down the home working request from a top performer, Mrs J Fellowes. This was even though her contract stated that she could work part-time from home. She needed to do so to look after her disabled mother.

Managers had concluded that they needed managers in the workplace to supervise junior staff. They did an office re-organisation that led to Mrs Fellowes becoming jobless.

In December 2020, the employment tribunal upheld claims against Nationwide that included unfair dismissal, indirect associative discrimination and indirect sex discrimination.

Tagged

discrimination Employment Tribunal home working unfair dismissal

Related News Stories

Executive faced a ruined career after botched sacking

Executive faced a ruined career after botched sacking

An advanced mental health practitioner was recently awarded over £60,000 after he was sacked without a fair process. An employment…

Read more
CBI scandal: what if your employee is accused of a serious crime?

CBI scandal: what if your employee is accused of a serious crime?

The CBI has been rocked by accusations of rape and sexual misconduct. With its reputation in tatters, members leaving by…

Read more
F-words at work – OK, but saying ‘baldie’ – not

F-words at work – OK, but saying ‘baldie’ – not

Swearing at work was ruled acceptable by one employment tribunal judge, while another gave out £71,000 in compensation when a…

Read more
Employer punished for unfair sex assault dismissal

Employer punished for unfair sex assault dismissal

Government agency bosses used a flawed procedure when firing a top foreign envoy for a sexual harassment accusation. The British…

Read more
Employers are punished for sacking bad workers

Employers are punished for sacking bad workers

A judge slapped down an employer who failed to follow a fair procedure when sacking a nurse for being racist.…

Read more
Managers’ confused performance assessment leads to big payout

Managers’ confused performance assessment leads to big payout

A well-known clothes store's flawed promotion and assessment process landed them with a £96,208 judgement at an employment tribunal. Bristol…

Read more
Frustrated manager’s decision leads to unfair dismissal

Frustrated manager’s decision leads to unfair dismissal

An employer lost an unfair dismissal case after summarily sacking an employee rather than go through a fair procedure. London…

Read more
Protected conversations expedite dismissals

Protected conversations expedite dismissals

The government has increased the scope for employers to sack employees without the threat of court cases. The new law…

Read more
Tesco gets burned by its fire and rehire tactics

Tesco gets burned by its fire and rehire tactics

A high street giant’s attempt to cut their staff bill was slapped down recently due to employment law. The High…

Read more
Tribunal defends  cross-dressing engineer

Tribunal defends cross-dressing engineer

A landmark court ruling has boosted employment lawyers’ chances of protecting ‘sex change’ workers from harassment and unfair dismissal. Birmingham…

Read more
Government demands employees return to work  – but not just yet

Government demands employees return to work – but not just yet

Government have changed their advice on telling employees to return to the workplace due to a spike in virus infections.…

Read more
Job redundancy or unfair dismissal

Job redundancy or unfair dismissal

The looming end to the government’s job subsidies in November will lead to some cynical bosses using redundancy to victimise…

Read more
Sickness sacking is valid without medical expertise

Sickness sacking is valid without medical expertise

A rail company did not need extensive medical evidence to sack an employee for being too sick to work. Employment…

Read more
Court upholds sacking over a Christmas overtime row

Court upholds sacking over a Christmas overtime row

An employment tribunal in November 2016 decided that a company fairly dismissed a worker when her refusal to do overtime…

Read more
Good employer loses appeal in migrant right to work case

Good employer loses appeal in migrant right to work case

Foreign workers have a right to appeal if they face dismissal over doubts about their UK residency status, appeal judges…

Read more
Jaw-jaw before war-war

Jaw-jaw before war-war

New legislation compels people in a workplace dispute to talk before going into legal battle in a court. Whether they…

Read more

    Sharma Solicitors is Regulated by Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA Number: 403199)