" "

Government demands employees return to work – but not just yet

17 Sep 2020
by Sharma Solicitors
COVID-19 employment law government advice

Government have changed their advice on telling employees to return to the workplace due to a spike in virus infections.

The government was urging employees to start working normally, plus including special health measures in the workplace, but since 22 September are telling employees to work from home if they can.

The government is changing their advice after a spike in infections that led to  medical experts fearing that cases could go to 50,000 a day by mid-October.

Government estimates that In six months’ time, when infections return to a manageable level, they will be able to tell employees to return to the workplace and follow their health safety advice.

Consultation process

Employment law advice will include the Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service (ACAS) telling employers that employers can reduce the risk of providing  grounds for unfair dismissal by including trade unions, employees and health and safety representatives in the consultation process.

Employers should also check any agreements they have with unions or employee representatives about formal consultation. Employment legal advice recommends employers check their employee’s employment contracts to clarify the rights of both parties.

ACAS’ good practice advice recommends discussion about:

  • – when employees return to the workplace
  • – whether a return will be phased
  • – how staff travel to work
  • – reviewing health and safety in the workplace
  • – changes to the work environment to promote health and safety
  • – changes to the working hours, and
  • – arrangements for working from home.

Discrimination and employment tribunals

The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) warns employers about making decisions that could lead to a discrimination employment tribunal case. Without employment law advice, decisions about who returns to the workplace, who gets extra hours and job redundancies could result in unlawful treatment of employees based on ‘protected characteristics’.

Protected characteristics involve the sex of an employee, race, age, disability and other factors. The EHRC provides an example of a manager asking a mother working from home to check in with him more than a male employee because she has children to look after.

Employers should record their decision about subjects such as who is asked to return to work, job redundancies, furloughs, unpaid leave, changing the environment and flexible working.

The Government also calls on employers to follow its advice about ‘COVID-19 secure’ to ensure that the workplace is safe. Employers should come to pragmatic agreements about the workplace after consultation.

If an employee believes that the employer is not doing enough to make the workplace COVID-19 secure, they can report this to their local authority or the Health and Safety Executive. Further, section 44 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 protects an employee who refuses to return to work because of a fear for his health and safety.

 

Photo credit: ILO News

Tagged

COVID-19 employment law employment legal advice employment solicitors employmnent tribunal equality Equality Act redundancy

Related News Stories

Executive faced a ruined career after botched sacking

Executive faced a ruined career after botched sacking

An advanced mental health practitioner was recently awarded over £60,000 after he was sacked without a fair process. An employment…

Read more
CBI scandal: what if your employee is accused of a serious crime?

CBI scandal: what if your employee is accused of a serious crime?

The CBI has been rocked by accusations of rape and sexual misconduct. With its reputation in tatters, members leaving by…

Read more
F-words at work – OK, but saying ‘baldie’ – not

F-words at work – OK, but saying ‘baldie’ – not

Swearing at work was ruled acceptable by one employment tribunal judge, while another gave out £71,000 in compensation when a…

Read more
Employer punished for unfair sex assault dismissal

Employer punished for unfair sex assault dismissal

Government agency bosses used a flawed procedure when firing a top foreign envoy for a sexual harassment accusation. The British…

Read more
Employers face legal traps over home working

Employers face legal traps over home working

Employers risk making poor and costly decisions in response to employees asking to work from their homes. Two cases have…

Read more
Employers are punished for sacking bad workers

Employers are punished for sacking bad workers

A judge slapped down an employer who failed to follow a fair procedure when sacking a nurse for being racist.…

Read more
Managers’ confused performance assessment leads to big payout

Managers’ confused performance assessment leads to big payout

A well-known clothes store's flawed promotion and assessment process landed them with a £96,208 judgement at an employment tribunal. Bristol…

Read more
Frustrated manager’s decision leads to unfair dismissal

Frustrated manager’s decision leads to unfair dismissal

An employer lost an unfair dismissal case after summarily sacking an employee rather than go through a fair procedure. London…

Read more
Protected conversations expedite dismissals

Protected conversations expedite dismissals

The government has increased the scope for employers to sack employees without the threat of court cases. The new law…

Read more
Tesco gets burned by its fire and rehire tactics

Tesco gets burned by its fire and rehire tactics

A high street giant’s attempt to cut their staff bill was slapped down recently due to employment law. The High…

Read more
Tribunal defends  cross-dressing engineer

Tribunal defends cross-dressing engineer

A landmark court ruling has boosted employment lawyers’ chances of protecting ‘sex change’ workers from harassment and unfair dismissal. Birmingham…

Read more
Job redundancy or unfair dismissal

Job redundancy or unfair dismissal

The looming end to the government’s job subsidies in November will lead to some cynical bosses using redundancy to victimise…

Read more
Sickness sacking is valid without medical expertise

Sickness sacking is valid without medical expertise

A rail company did not need extensive medical evidence to sack an employee for being too sick to work. Employment…

Read more
Court upholds sacking over a Christmas overtime row

Court upholds sacking over a Christmas overtime row

An employment tribunal in November 2016 decided that a company fairly dismissed a worker when her refusal to do overtime…

Read more
Good employer loses appeal in migrant right to work case

Good employer loses appeal in migrant right to work case

Foreign workers have a right to appeal if they face dismissal over doubts about their UK residency status, appeal judges…

Read more
Jaw-jaw before war-war

Jaw-jaw before war-war

New legislation compels people in a workplace dispute to talk before going into legal battle in a court. Whether they…

Read more

    Sharma Solicitors is Regulated by Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA Number: 403199)