" "

Job redundancy or unfair dismissal

28 Jul 2020
by Sharma Solicitors
COVID-19 redundancy information

The looming end to the government’s job subsidies in November will lead to some cynical bosses using redundancy to victimise and sack workers.

To deal with this, employees and employers need redundancy advice that clearly defines what is a job redundancy and what is not.

Around 1.3 million people could face joblessness in the short term, with four million by the end of the year, when the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme is closed, according to the government’s Office of Budget Responsibility.

The Law Society Gazette reported that the president of the employment tribunals for England and Wales, Judge Barry Clarke, recently warned of an  explosion of unfair job redundancy claims following an end to the job scheme, also known as furlough.

Yet, problems with job redundancy can arise if an employer misuses it or if there is no genuine redundancy situation.

An employment tribunal case that ended in January 2020 led to Liz Earle Beauty Company having to pay former employee, Heidi Larkin, £17,303 in compensation. She argued that they rushed through her job redundancy before she could go on maternity leave. The company pleaded guilty and admitted using redundancy to sack her, where there was no genuine redundancy situation at all.

 

Redundancy legal advice

A job redundancy has to satisfy the requirements of Section 139 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.

Redundancy legal advice suggests that a redundancy situation arises where the employer ends or will end the:
– business for which the employee was employed,
– place of employment from where the business took place, or
– type of work for which the employee was hired.

The government’s redundancy legal advice about the Job Retention Scheme suggests an employee can be made redundant  even while they are on furlough.

However, only a genuine redundancy situation will permit the employer to commence a lawful procedure to achieve a legitimate job redundancy.

Yet, there could be further problems if there is no fair selection process,  or if the procedure is’ fixed’ for a predetermined outcome.

Absence of a genuine redundancy or a faulty redundancy procedure will convert what may have been a fair and lawful redundancy to an unfair dismissal.

Photo credit: citytransportinfo

Tagged

business COVID-19 discrimination employment law Equality Act redundancy unfair dismissal

Related News Stories

Executive faced a ruined career after botched sacking

Executive faced a ruined career after botched sacking

An advanced mental health practitioner was recently awarded over £60,000 after he was sacked without a fair process. An employment…

Read more
CBI scandal: what if your employee is accused of a serious crime?

CBI scandal: what if your employee is accused of a serious crime?

The CBI has been rocked by accusations of rape and sexual misconduct. With its reputation in tatters, members leaving by…

Read more
F-words at work – OK, but saying ‘baldie’ – not

F-words at work – OK, but saying ‘baldie’ – not

Swearing at work was ruled acceptable by one employment tribunal judge, while another gave out £71,000 in compensation when a…

Read more
Employer punished for unfair sex assault dismissal

Employer punished for unfair sex assault dismissal

Government agency bosses used a flawed procedure when firing a top foreign envoy for a sexual harassment accusation. The British…

Read more
Employers face legal traps over home working

Employers face legal traps over home working

Employers risk making poor and costly decisions in response to employees asking to work from their homes. Two cases have…

Read more
Employers are punished for sacking bad workers

Employers are punished for sacking bad workers

A judge slapped down an employer who failed to follow a fair procedure when sacking a nurse for being racist.…

Read more
Managers’ confused performance assessment leads to big payout

Managers’ confused performance assessment leads to big payout

A well-known clothes store's flawed promotion and assessment process landed them with a £96,208 judgement at an employment tribunal. Bristol…

Read more
Frustrated manager’s decision leads to unfair dismissal

Frustrated manager’s decision leads to unfair dismissal

An employer lost an unfair dismissal case after summarily sacking an employee rather than go through a fair procedure. London…

Read more
Protected conversations expedite dismissals

Protected conversations expedite dismissals

The government has increased the scope for employers to sack employees without the threat of court cases. The new law…

Read more
Tesco gets burned by its fire and rehire tactics

Tesco gets burned by its fire and rehire tactics

A high street giant’s attempt to cut their staff bill was slapped down recently due to employment law. The High…

Read more
Tribunal defends  cross-dressing engineer

Tribunal defends cross-dressing engineer

A landmark court ruling has boosted employment lawyers’ chances of protecting ‘sex change’ workers from harassment and unfair dismissal. Birmingham…

Read more
Government demands employees return to work  – but not just yet

Government demands employees return to work – but not just yet

Government have changed their advice on telling employees to return to the workplace due to a spike in virus infections.…

Read more
Sickness sacking is valid without medical expertise

Sickness sacking is valid without medical expertise

A rail company did not need extensive medical evidence to sack an employee for being too sick to work. Employment…

Read more
Court upholds sacking over a Christmas overtime row

Court upholds sacking over a Christmas overtime row

An employment tribunal in November 2016 decided that a company fairly dismissed a worker when her refusal to do overtime…

Read more
Good employer loses appeal in migrant right to work case

Good employer loses appeal in migrant right to work case

Foreign workers have a right to appeal if they face dismissal over doubts about their UK residency status, appeal judges…

Read more
Jaw-jaw before war-war

Jaw-jaw before war-war

New legislation compels people in a workplace dispute to talk before going into legal battle in a court. Whether they…

Read more

    Sharma Solicitors is Regulated by Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA Number: 403199)