" "

Zero-hours contract – zero rights

26 May 2014
by Sharma Solicitors

The growth in the use of zero-hour contracts will mean more workers will lose their right not to be unfairly dismissed.

Typically, the employment status of a zero-hour contract worker is not the same as an employee who does qualify for employment rights. But a dispute on these issues will be determined by an employment tribunal.

The rise in zero-hours contracts have only just been matched by the surge in press interest for this working arrangement. Accurate figures, however, are more elusive.

The Office for National Statistics estimated that 1.4 million workers were employed on zero-hours contracts – February 2014. The Chartered Institute for Personnel Development estimated around one million employees were on zero-hours contracts – November 2013.

Zero-hours contracts provide a worker with an hourly rate of pay only when they have been engaged to perform work. There is no guarantee the employer will provide work and when work is not provided there is no pay. A common feature of these employment contracts is that staff are expected to be on standby and are unable to look for work elsewhere.

The recent trend has been for the spread of zero-hours contracts from low-paid sectors such as hospitality and retail to professionals such as hospital consultants and lecturers. Employers from JD Wetherspoon to Buckingham Palace use zero-hours contracts.

Benefits

The principal benefit for an employer of using zero-hours contracts is to maintain a flexible workforce able to meet fluctuating staff requirements such as in restaurants and shops. The costs tend to be cheaper than agency fees.

If the contract permits, employees gain flexibility to reject the offer of work if they find it inconvenient.

Rights and tribunals

Whether a worker is an employee with greater employment rights or only a worker with few rights is a matter for the employment tribunal. The tribunal will determine this point by closely scrutinising the working relationship.

Is the employee genuinely entitled to reject offers of work or not? If not, he maybe an employee.

In the recent case, Pulse Healthcare Ltd –V- Carewatch Care Services EAT 0123/12, the Employment Appeals Tribunal ruled the workers were employees despite the fact the contract was titled ‘Zero Hours Contract Agreement’.

A few other employment benefits continue to be available to both workers and employees, e.g. holidays, maximum working week of 48 hours.

The government has completed its review on zero-hours contracts but have yet to announce its reforms. The Labour Party has announced a manifesto commitment to give workers the right to ask for fixed-hours contracts after six months service. Either way, what is guaranteed is further press interest in the coming months.

 

Photo credit: Wikimedia Commons

Tagged

employees employers Employment Tribunal human resources

Related News Stories

Executive faced a ruined career after botched sacking

Executive faced a ruined career after botched sacking

An advanced mental health practitioner was recently awarded over £60,000 after he was sacked without a fair process. An employment…

Read more
CBI scandal: what if your employee is accused of a serious crime?

CBI scandal: what if your employee is accused of a serious crime?

The CBI has been rocked by accusations of rape and sexual misconduct. With its reputation in tatters, members leaving by…

Read more
F-words at work – OK, but saying ‘baldie’ – not

F-words at work – OK, but saying ‘baldie’ – not

Swearing at work was ruled acceptable by one employment tribunal judge, while another gave out £71,000 in compensation when a…

Read more
Employer punished for unfair sex assault dismissal

Employer punished for unfair sex assault dismissal

Government agency bosses used a flawed procedure when firing a top foreign envoy for a sexual harassment accusation. The British…

Read more
Employers face legal traps over home working

Employers face legal traps over home working

Employers risk making poor and costly decisions in response to employees asking to work from their homes. Two cases have…

Read more
Employers are punished for sacking bad workers

Employers are punished for sacking bad workers

A judge slapped down an employer who failed to follow a fair procedure when sacking a nurse for being racist.…

Read more
Managers’ confused performance assessment leads to big payout

Managers’ confused performance assessment leads to big payout

A well-known clothes store's flawed promotion and assessment process landed them with a £96,208 judgement at an employment tribunal. Bristol…

Read more
Frustrated manager’s decision leads to unfair dismissal

Frustrated manager’s decision leads to unfair dismissal

An employer lost an unfair dismissal case after summarily sacking an employee rather than go through a fair procedure. London…

Read more
Protected conversations expedite dismissals

Protected conversations expedite dismissals

The government has increased the scope for employers to sack employees without the threat of court cases. The new law…

Read more
Tesco gets burned by its fire and rehire tactics

Tesco gets burned by its fire and rehire tactics

A high street giant’s attempt to cut their staff bill was slapped down recently due to employment law. The High…

Read more
Tribunal defends  cross-dressing engineer

Tribunal defends cross-dressing engineer

A landmark court ruling has boosted employment lawyers’ chances of protecting ‘sex change’ workers from harassment and unfair dismissal. Birmingham…

Read more
Government demands employees return to work  – but not just yet

Government demands employees return to work – but not just yet

Government have changed their advice on telling employees to return to the workplace due to a spike in virus infections.…

Read more
Job redundancy or unfair dismissal

Job redundancy or unfair dismissal

The looming end to the government’s job subsidies in November will lead to some cynical bosses using redundancy to victimise…

Read more
Sickness sacking is valid without medical expertise

Sickness sacking is valid without medical expertise

A rail company did not need extensive medical evidence to sack an employee for being too sick to work. Employment…

Read more
Court upholds sacking over a Christmas overtime row

Court upholds sacking over a Christmas overtime row

An employment tribunal in November 2016 decided that a company fairly dismissed a worker when her refusal to do overtime…

Read more
Good employer loses appeal in migrant right to work case

Good employer loses appeal in migrant right to work case

Foreign workers have a right to appeal if they face dismissal over doubts about their UK residency status, appeal judges…

Read more
Jaw-jaw before war-war

Jaw-jaw before war-war

New legislation compels people in a workplace dispute to talk before going into legal battle in a court. Whether they…

Read more

    Sharma Solicitors is Regulated by Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA Number: 403199)