" "

Workplace abuse on Facebook triggered legal action

28 Aug 2019
by

An employee’s racially insulting social media post forced Heathrow airport managers to defend themselves in employment tribunals.

London Heathrow Airport’s employment lawyers argued against charges of harassment, victimisation and discrimination at employment and appeal tribunals.

The trouble started in November 2016 after airport employee, Deborah Stevens posted a golliwog on a private Facebook post seen by friends and workmates.

The image was accompanied by the message: ‘Let’s see how far he can travel before Facebook takes him off.’ A colleague of Ms Stevens showed the image to security guard, Mr. Forbes.

Mr Forbes was shocked and appalled by a co-worker posting a racially offensive image. He  complained to managers and that led to an apology and disciplinary action taken against Ms Stevens.

But another row followed when his managers moved him when he complained about being required to work alongside Ms Stevens. He lodged a legal case against Heathrow Airport at the Employment Tribunal.

Employers’ liability

Mr. Forbes’ employment lawyers argued that section 109 of the Equality Act 2010 meant that an employer was ‘vicariously liable’ for the actions of an employee done ‘in the course of employment’.

The case eventually went to the Employment Appeal Tribunal and in February 2019 the court agreed that the post was offensive. It also supported an original decision by the lower tribunal that London Heathrow could not be held responsible for the post.

The courts heard that the co-worker did not create the post on the employer’s property or during working hours.

Other issues the court took into account was that the image made no reference to London Heathrow and that Heathrow had taken steps to address the issue.

A lesson from the case is that employers need a social media policy and dignity at work policies a court would respect.

Photo by NordWood Themes

Tagged

bullying employees employment law Employment Tribunal workplace harassment

Related News Stories

Executive faced a ruined career after botched sacking

Executive faced a ruined career after botched sacking

An advanced mental health practitioner was recently awarded over £60,000 after he was sacked without a fair process. An employment…

Read more
CBI scandal: what if your employee is accused of a serious crime?

CBI scandal: what if your employee is accused of a serious crime?

The CBI has been rocked by accusations of rape and sexual misconduct. With its reputation in tatters, members leaving by…

Read more
F-words at work – OK, but saying ‘baldie’ – not

F-words at work – OK, but saying ‘baldie’ – not

Swearing at work was ruled acceptable by one employment tribunal judge, while another gave out £71,000 in compensation when a…

Read more
Employer punished for unfair sex assault dismissal

Employer punished for unfair sex assault dismissal

Government agency bosses used a flawed procedure when firing a top foreign envoy for a sexual harassment accusation. The British…

Read more
Employers face legal traps over home working

Employers face legal traps over home working

Employers risk making poor and costly decisions in response to employees asking to work from their homes. Two cases have…

Read more
Employers are punished for sacking bad workers

Employers are punished for sacking bad workers

A judge slapped down an employer who failed to follow a fair procedure when sacking a nurse for being racist.…

Read more
Managers’ confused performance assessment leads to big payout

Managers’ confused performance assessment leads to big payout

A well-known clothes store's flawed promotion and assessment process landed them with a £96,208 judgement at an employment tribunal. Bristol…

Read more
Frustrated manager’s decision leads to unfair dismissal

Frustrated manager’s decision leads to unfair dismissal

An employer lost an unfair dismissal case after summarily sacking an employee rather than go through a fair procedure. London…

Read more
Protected conversations expedite dismissals

Protected conversations expedite dismissals

The government has increased the scope for employers to sack employees without the threat of court cases. The new law…

Read more
Tesco gets burned by its fire and rehire tactics

Tesco gets burned by its fire and rehire tactics

A high street giant’s attempt to cut their staff bill was slapped down recently due to employment law. The High…

Read more
Tribunal defends  cross-dressing engineer

Tribunal defends cross-dressing engineer

A landmark court ruling has boosted employment lawyers’ chances of protecting ‘sex change’ workers from harassment and unfair dismissal. Birmingham…

Read more
Government demands employees return to work  – but not just yet

Government demands employees return to work – but not just yet

Government have changed their advice on telling employees to return to the workplace due to a spike in virus infections.…

Read more
Job redundancy or unfair dismissal

Job redundancy or unfair dismissal

The looming end to the government’s job subsidies in November will lead to some cynical bosses using redundancy to victimise…

Read more
Sickness sacking is valid without medical expertise

Sickness sacking is valid without medical expertise

A rail company did not need extensive medical evidence to sack an employee for being too sick to work. Employment…

Read more
Court upholds sacking over a Christmas overtime row

Court upholds sacking over a Christmas overtime row

An employment tribunal in November 2016 decided that a company fairly dismissed a worker when her refusal to do overtime…

Read more
Good employer loses appeal in migrant right to work case

Good employer loses appeal in migrant right to work case

Foreign workers have a right to appeal if they face dismissal over doubts about their UK residency status, appeal judges…

Read more
Jaw-jaw before war-war

Jaw-jaw before war-war

New legislation compels people in a workplace dispute to talk before going into legal battle in a court. Whether they…

Read more
Sharma Solicitors is Regulated by Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA Number: 403199)