" "

Firm’s holiday policy is discriminatory

11 Mar 2022
by Sharma Solicitors
religious discrimination. Judaism

An employer took the wrong decision and fired an employee for wanting time off to mark a religious holiday.

In a case about religious discrimination, an employment tribunal decided against personal injury solicitors firm, NNE Law, and awarded their employee £26,000.

The tribunal found that the firm breached employment law even though it applied their policy on annual leave. It put litigation executive, Mr Bialick, at an unfair disadvantage because he was Jewish.

Mr Bialick had booked a holiday for 8 and 9 April 2020 two months earlier, to observe the Passover.

He emailed his employer asking them to honour his holiday request because it observed a religious event. But the employer responded by firing him.

The employer argued that his presence in the office as ‘essential’ to the firm. Mr Bialick had already taken days off when he followed the government’s covid direction to stay at home. The employer had become impatient with the employee due to his absence in March.

Holiday policy

NNE Law sent a letter to Mr Bialick on 2 April criticising him for his absence, and stated that due to ‘staffing issues’, he should work rather than take his annual leave.

After, Mr Bialick emailed his employer asking to honour his religious observance, NNE Law sent him a letter on 9 April terminating his employment.

In its judgement, the employment tribunal noted that although the firm’s policy was about meeting the needs of clients, no evidence was provided that Mr Bialick’s presence was necessary.

It also stated that there were other, less discriminatory ways than requiring Mr Bialick’s presence at the office.

The tribunal stated that the firm’s decision to call on their employee to decide whether to cancel his holiday and therefore fail to observe their religious practice or face the sack is discrimination against Jewish employees.

Tagged

annual leave discrimination employment law religion

Related News Stories

Executive faced a ruined career after botched sacking

Executive faced a ruined career after botched sacking

An advanced mental health practitioner was recently awarded over £60,000 after he was sacked without a fair process. An employment…

Read more
CBI scandal: what if your employee is accused of a serious crime?

CBI scandal: what if your employee is accused of a serious crime?

The CBI has been rocked by accusations of rape and sexual misconduct. With its reputation in tatters, members leaving by…

Read more
F-words at work – OK, but saying ‘baldie’ – not

F-words at work – OK, but saying ‘baldie’ – not

Swearing at work was ruled acceptable by one employment tribunal judge, while another gave out £71,000 in compensation when a…

Read more
Employer punished for unfair sex assault dismissal

Employer punished for unfair sex assault dismissal

Government agency bosses used a flawed procedure when firing a top foreign envoy for a sexual harassment accusation. The British…

Read more
Employers face legal traps over home working

Employers face legal traps over home working

Employers risk making poor and costly decisions in response to employees asking to work from their homes. Two cases have…

Read more
Employers are punished for sacking bad workers

Employers are punished for sacking bad workers

A judge slapped down an employer who failed to follow a fair procedure when sacking a nurse for being racist.…

Read more
Managers’ confused performance assessment leads to big payout

Managers’ confused performance assessment leads to big payout

A well-known clothes store's flawed promotion and assessment process landed them with a £96,208 judgement at an employment tribunal. Bristol…

Read more
Frustrated manager’s decision leads to unfair dismissal

Frustrated manager’s decision leads to unfair dismissal

An employer lost an unfair dismissal case after summarily sacking an employee rather than go through a fair procedure. London…

Read more
Protected conversations expedite dismissals

Protected conversations expedite dismissals

The government has increased the scope for employers to sack employees without the threat of court cases. The new law…

Read more
Tesco gets burned by its fire and rehire tactics

Tesco gets burned by its fire and rehire tactics

A high street giant’s attempt to cut their staff bill was slapped down recently due to employment law. The High…

Read more
Tribunal defends  cross-dressing engineer

Tribunal defends cross-dressing engineer

A landmark court ruling has boosted employment lawyers’ chances of protecting ‘sex change’ workers from harassment and unfair dismissal. Birmingham…

Read more
Government demands employees return to work  – but not just yet

Government demands employees return to work – but not just yet

Government have changed their advice on telling employees to return to the workplace due to a spike in virus infections.…

Read more
Job redundancy or unfair dismissal

Job redundancy or unfair dismissal

The looming end to the government’s job subsidies in November will lead to some cynical bosses using redundancy to victimise…

Read more
Sickness sacking is valid without medical expertise

Sickness sacking is valid without medical expertise

A rail company did not need extensive medical evidence to sack an employee for being too sick to work. Employment…

Read more
Court upholds sacking over a Christmas overtime row

Court upholds sacking over a Christmas overtime row

An employment tribunal in November 2016 decided that a company fairly dismissed a worker when her refusal to do overtime…

Read more
Good employer loses appeal in migrant right to work case

Good employer loses appeal in migrant right to work case

Foreign workers have a right to appeal if they face dismissal over doubts about their UK residency status, appeal judges…

Read more
Jaw-jaw before war-war

Jaw-jaw before war-war

New legislation compels people in a workplace dispute to talk before going into legal battle in a court. Whether they…

Read more

    Sharma Solicitors is Regulated by Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA Number: 403199)