Travelling between jobs is work not play, says EU
EU judges have changed rules affecting trades people who normally work away from their workplace.
Employees will be able to argue that travelling should be called ‘working time’ rather than a rest period.
The rule affects professionals such as gas and electricity service engineers, as well as sales reps and couriers.
Judges say that it is work when an employee travels from home directly to a customer’s premises but does not need to travel to his or her workplace.
Recently, judges at the Court of Justice of the European Union, in SA Case C 266/14 ECJ, upheld a Spanish court decision and made it part of the Working Time Directive so that it applies throughout the Union.
The rule change arose from a judgment in the case of Federacion de Servicios Privados del sindicato Comisiones obreras v Tyco Integrated Security SL.
The Spanish court heard that Tyco employed technicians to install and maintain security equipment at customers’ premises without the need of regular face-to-face communication at their offices.
The technicians often travelled from their home, sometimes up to 100km, and only went to the office once a week to collect tools and materials.
But Tyco argued that the travelling time did not involve actual work and so was a ‘rest period’.
Tyco also said trades people made their own decisions about travel and that put them beyond the Working Time Directive.
The Court of Justice rejected these arguments.
Judges ruled that health and safety would be in jeopardy if travelling time was regarded as just a rest period.
They also said that workers could not shorten the travelling time or use it for personal purposes.
Employers now may have to provide finance for staff who spend time travelling to their first job of the day and home from their last.
Related News Stories
An advanced mental health practitioner was recently awarded over £60,000 after he was sacked without a fair process. An employment…
The CBI has been rocked by accusations of rape and sexual misconduct. With its reputation in tatters, members leaving by…
Swearing at work was ruled acceptable by one employment tribunal judge, while another gave out £71,000 in compensation when a…
Government agency bosses used a flawed procedure when firing a top foreign envoy for a sexual harassment accusation. The British…
Employers risk making poor and costly decisions in response to employees asking to work from their homes. Two cases have…
A judge slapped down an employer who failed to follow a fair procedure when sacking a nurse for being racist.…
A well-known clothes store's flawed promotion and assessment process landed them with a £96,208 judgement at an employment tribunal. Bristol…
An employer lost an unfair dismissal case after summarily sacking an employee rather than go through a fair procedure. London…
The government has increased the scope for employers to sack employees without the threat of court cases. The new law…
A high street giant’s attempt to cut their staff bill was slapped down recently due to employment law. The High…
A landmark court ruling has boosted employment lawyers’ chances of protecting ‘sex change’ workers from harassment and unfair dismissal. Birmingham…
Government have changed their advice on telling employees to return to the workplace due to a spike in virus infections.…
The looming end to the government’s job subsidies in November will lead to some cynical bosses using redundancy to victimise…
A rail company did not need extensive medical evidence to sack an employee for being too sick to work. Employment…
An employment tribunal in November 2016 decided that a company fairly dismissed a worker when her refusal to do overtime…
Foreign workers have a right to appeal if they face dismissal over doubts about their UK residency status, appeal judges…
New legislation compels people in a workplace dispute to talk before going into legal battle in a court. Whether they…