Ruling means employers should check their dads’ policies
A dad won his discrimination case about not having a pay cut that mums do not when looking after his new baby.
An Employment Tribunal, Mr Ali v Capita Customer Management Limited, judged that in this case a father was entitled to the same rate of enhanced pay as mothers under maternity leave policy.
Mr Ali alleged direct sex discrimination because his employer treated him less favourably than female employees. Capita gave the mother enhanced pay for 14 weeks of maternity leave but fathers only received statutory pay. Mr Ali wanted to take care of his new child when his wife became unwell.
He argued that there was an unfair assumption that a man caring for his baby was not entitled to the same pay as a woman. He said this took away choice he and his wife could make about who looked after the baby.
Paying for paternity
The Tribunal said that the employer’s policies meant that men and women who took leave to care for their babies were not treated equally in relation to pay. But, the Tribunal held that less favourable treatment did not apply to the first two weeks of maternity leave that was compulsory for mothers. Mr Ali was actually received his full pay during the first two weeks that he was able to take.
The case is not necessarily applicable to other cases because the Tribunal has to look at the precise facts of a particular situation. Yet, employers should review their maternity and paternity leave policies so that employees receive the same benefits.
For further information about the Equality Act please contact Sharma Solicitors 03454300145. Sh**************@sh**************.com">Sh**************@sh**************.com. www.sharmasolicitors.com
Related News Stories
An advanced mental health practitioner was recently awarded over £60,000 after he was sacked without a fair process. An employment…
The CBI has been rocked by accusations of rape and sexual misconduct. With its reputation in tatters, members leaving by…
Swearing at work was ruled acceptable by one employment tribunal judge, while another gave out £71,000 in compensation when a…
Government agency bosses used a flawed procedure when firing a top foreign envoy for a sexual harassment accusation. The British…
Employers risk making poor and costly decisions in response to employees asking to work from their homes. Two cases have…
A judge slapped down an employer who failed to follow a fair procedure when sacking a nurse for being racist.…
A well-known clothes store's flawed promotion and assessment process landed them with a £96,208 judgement at an employment tribunal. Bristol…
An employer lost an unfair dismissal case after summarily sacking an employee rather than go through a fair procedure. London…
The government has increased the scope for employers to sack employees without the threat of court cases. The new law…
A high street giant’s attempt to cut their staff bill was slapped down recently due to employment law. The High…
A landmark court ruling has boosted employment lawyers’ chances of protecting ‘sex change’ workers from harassment and unfair dismissal. Birmingham…
Government have changed their advice on telling employees to return to the workplace due to a spike in virus infections.…
The looming end to the government’s job subsidies in November will lead to some cynical bosses using redundancy to victimise…
A rail company did not need extensive medical evidence to sack an employee for being too sick to work. Employment…
An employment tribunal in November 2016 decided that a company fairly dismissed a worker when her refusal to do overtime…
Foreign workers have a right to appeal if they face dismissal over doubts about their UK residency status, appeal judges…
New legislation compels people in a workplace dispute to talk before going into legal battle in a court. Whether they…